Skip to content

Revert "Bumped version to 6.30.0-rc.0"#27377

Merged
cmraible merged 1 commit intomainfrom
change-package-json-version
Apr 13, 2026
Merged

Revert "Bumped version to 6.30.0-rc.0"#27377
cmraible merged 1 commit intomainfrom
change-package-json-version

Conversation

@cmraible
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@cmraible cmraible commented Apr 13, 2026

ref #27376

This reverts commit 60ba212.

The v6.29.0 release failed after creating the tag. This reverts the version in package.json back to v6.29.0 so that we can release v6.29.1.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 13, 2026

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the version numbers in two package.json files within the Ghost project. The version field in ghost/admin/package.json and ghost/core/package.json are both changed from 6.30.0-rc.0 to 6.29.0. No other configurations, dependencies, scripts, or metadata in these files are modified. Each file has a single line changed, representing a minimal code review effort.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and accurately describes the main change: reverting a version bump in package.json files from 6.30.0-rc.0 back to 6.29.0.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description check ✅ Passed The pull request description clearly explains the purpose of the changes: reverting a previous commit to downgrade the package version from 6.30.0-rc.0 back to 6.29.0 to facilitate releasing v6.29.1 after a failed v6.29.0 release.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch change-package-json-version

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@cmraible cmraible marked this pull request as ready for review April 13, 2026 21:30
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@cmraible cmraible enabled auto-merge (squash) April 13, 2026 21:32
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@EvanHahn EvanHahn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We talked about this on a call.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 13, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 73.50%. Comparing base (60ba212) to head (812a3b0).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #27377   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.50%   73.50%           
=======================================
  Files        1547     1547           
  Lines      124041   124041           
  Branches    15023    15023           
=======================================
+ Hits        91176    91178    +2     
+ Misses      31837    31836    -1     
+ Partials     1028     1027    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
admin-tests 54.37% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
e2e-tests 73.50% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@cmraible cmraible merged commit d23464f into main Apr 13, 2026
46 checks passed
@cmraible cmraible deleted the change-package-json-version branch April 13, 2026 21:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants