-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
12 In summary
The method rests on four principles taken from consolidated traditions and composed into a unique form. The specification precedes the product and is the source of truth. Decisions are numbered and motivated, so that they are not re-argued. Open points are tracked instead of blocking or being hidden. The digital interlocutors are made distinct in order to multiply the perspectives on a problem, with the declared awareness that the distinction is necessary but not sufficient.
What holds the four principles together is a single conviction, verified by use: work with a language model produces lasting value only if the reasoning that generates it is held on to, structured and opened to more voices — instead of slipping away in the flow of a conversation no one re-reads. To this conviction, and to the form that gives it body, the document has given a name: Koòrdinated Thinking.
«Koòrdinated Thinking» — «If reasoning isn't held on to, where does it go?», Team HITL & AI, UnmarkedPM & iride.ch SA, 2026. Licensed CC BY 4.0. Wiki text derives from the repository, which is the source of truth.
- 01 · The problem of working with a model
- 02 · The specification before the product
- 03 · Declaring the boundaries, accepting good enough
- 04 · The iterative dialogue and its open points
- 05 · The decision log
- 06 · The specification's anchors
- 07 · Keeping the specification as it grows
- 08 · Two ways to break the single perspective
- 09 · Why the method holds
- 10 · Where the method costs and where it falls short
- 11 · From method to tool
- 12 · In summary
- 13 · References