Summary
During code-audit workflows, cdidx can help find candidates, but turning findings into GitHub issues still requires manual draft tracking and duplicate checks.
Motivation
This audit loop repeatedly produced issue candidates, then required a separate gh issue list --state open pass to avoid duplicate open issues before creation. The code-search step would be smoother if cdidx could preserve structured issue drafts and preflight them against open issue titles/labels.
Suggested enhancement
Add an audit/suggestions workflow that can export issue drafts with title, labels, evidence paths, and body text, then optionally run an open-issue duplicate preflight before handing them to gh issue create or another issue backend.
Notes
The feature should not create issues automatically by default. It should make the human review step faster and less error-prone.
Summary
During code-audit workflows, cdidx can help find candidates, but turning findings into GitHub issues still requires manual draft tracking and duplicate checks.
Motivation
This audit loop repeatedly produced issue candidates, then required a separate
gh issue list --state openpass to avoid duplicate open issues before creation. The code-search step would be smoother if cdidx could preserve structured issue drafts and preflight them against open issue titles/labels.Suggested enhancement
Add an audit/suggestions workflow that can export issue drafts with title, labels, evidence paths, and body text, then optionally run an open-issue duplicate preflight before handing them to
gh issue createor another issue backend.Notes
The feature should not create issues automatically by default. It should make the human review step faster and less error-prone.