Skip to content

feat(core): add read only protection for opcodes #33637#1984

Merged
AnilChinchawale merged 1 commit intoXinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
gzliudan:add-readonly-protect
Feb 5, 2026
Merged

feat(core): add read only protection for opcodes #33637#1984
AnilChinchawale merged 1 commit intoXinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
gzliudan:add-readonly-protect

Conversation

@gzliudan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Proposed changes

This PR reverts a part of changes brought by the PR #1960.

Specifically, read-only protection should always be enforced at the opcode level,
regardless of whether the check has already been performed during gas metering.

It should act as a gatekeeper, otherwise, it is easy to introduce errors by adding
new gas measurement logic without consistently applying the read-only protection.

Ref: ethereum#33637

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)
  • Regular KTLO or any of the maintaince work. e.g code style
  • CICD Improvement

Impacted Components

Which part of the codebase this PR will touch base on,

Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Consensus
  • Account
  • Network
  • Geth
  • Smart Contract
  • External components
  • Not sure (Please specify below)

Checklist

Put an in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that

  • This PR has sufficient test coverage (unit/integration test) OR I have provided reason in the PR description for not having test coverage
  • Provide an end-to-end test plan in the PR description on how to manually test it on the devnet/testnet.
  • Tested the backwards compatibility.
  • Tested with XDC nodes running this version co-exist with those running the previous version.
  • Relevant documentation has been updated as part of this PR
  • N/A

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 23, 2026 07:28
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR reverts a portion of changes introduced in PR #1960 by restoring read-only protection checks at the opcode level for state-modifying operations. The change ensures that read-only validation acts as a defensive gatekeeper, preventing potential bugs from future gas measurement logic modifications that might omit these critical checks.

Changes:

  • Restored read-only checks in opSstore, opCall, opSelfdestruct, and opSelfdestruct6780 opcodes
  • Modified makeSelfdestructGasFn to return ErrOutOfGas instead of the gas value when insufficient gas remains

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
core/vm/instructions.go Re-added read-only protection checks to SSTORE, CALL (when transferring value), SELFDESTRUCT, and SELFDESTRUCT6780 opcodes as defensive programming
core/vm/operations_acl.go Changed error handling in selfdestruct gas function to return ErrOutOfGas immediately when gas is insufficient, preventing state access

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread core/vm/operations_acl.go
@gzliudan gzliudan requested a review from wanwiset25 January 26, 2026 09:50
@gzliudan gzliudan changed the title core/vm: add read only protection for opcodes #33637 feat(core): add read only protection for opcodes #33637 Feb 5, 2026
@AnilChinchawale AnilChinchawale merged commit 1655f80 into XinFinOrg:dev-upgrade Feb 5, 2026
19 checks passed
@gzliudan gzliudan deleted the add-readonly-protect branch February 5, 2026 07:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants