Repository navigation
Skill Perspective
Examine one concern through a useful evidence-based lens.
Perspective brings a different question to the current work: can this be reversed, who bears its costs, or what would make the measurement misleading? It draws from the shared lens library and applies the selected procedure to the actual evidence.
Use it when: A bounded concern or tradeoff deserves attention, without a full adjudicated review of the whole proposal.
Use something simpler when: The evidence already answers the concern, or another pass would only repeat an existing finding.
Look at this migration through reversibility: what exactly would rollback restore, and what would it leave behind?
What a useful result looks like: A supported insight, practical improvement, confirmation of adequacy, or explicit evidence gap. The result names what could change the next action. Additional lenses are useful only for distinct remaining questions.
Boundary: Lens names are method identifiers, not credentials or proof of expert participation. Several lenses still do not create a Gauntlet verdict; plural scrutiny plus adjudication is the relevant boundary.
Metacognate examines the reasoning itself; Gauntlet adjudicates a consequential common subject.
Applies to: epistemic-skills v7.3.0. Release notes · Source for these pages · The skills as released
Start here
Use the skills
Understand the design
Install and troubleshoot
Maintain and verify