Skip to content

ci: add dependency review workflow#78

Merged
wizzomafizzo merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/dep-review
Apr 10, 2026
Merged

ci: add dependency review workflow#78
wizzomafizzo merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/dep-review

Conversation

@wizzomafizzo

@wizzomafizzo wizzomafizzo commented Apr 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Add dependency review on PRs targeting main
  • Blocks PRs that introduce dependencies with known vulnerabilities or disallowed licenses

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added automated dependency review workflow for pull requests targeting the main branch.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow is introduced that automatically performs dependency reviews on pull requests targeting the main branch. The workflow uses pinned action versions and sets repository permissions to read-only for contents access.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency Review Workflow
.github/workflows/dependency-review.yml
New workflow file that executes dependency review checks on PRs to main branch, with pinned action versions and read-only repository permissions.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A workflow so keen,
Dependencies reviewed, squeaky-clean!
Pinned actions stand guard,
With permissions that're hard—
Security's tight on the main branch scene! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'ci: add dependency review workflow' is a concise, specific summary that directly matches the main change: adding a GitHub Actions workflow for dependency review.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/dep-review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Apr 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/dependency-review.yml:
- Around line 18-19: The Dependency Review workflow step ("Dependency Review"
that uses
actions/dependency-review-action@2031cfc080254a8a887f58cffee85186f0e49e48) lacks
an explicit license policy; update that step to include a with: configuration
that either sets deny-licenses (a comma-separated list of license identifiers
you want to block) or points to a config-file (e.g.,
.github/dependency-review.yml) that defines the license denylist and rules, so
the dependency-review action will enforce disallowed licenses on PRs.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 743b52a0-f159-423f-856b-18fecb4b68ce

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between baa7641 and 9566819.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/dependency-review.yml

Comment thread .github/workflows/dependency-review.yml
@wizzomafizzo
wizzomafizzo merged commit cd0cc78 into main Apr 10, 2026
6 checks passed
@wizzomafizzo
wizzomafizzo deleted the chore/dep-review branch April 10, 2026 02:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant