Use B_bool singletons in toB_bool(b)#2491
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Do not allocate a new B_bool whenever we need an Acton bool!
Contributor
|
@mzagozen and I discussed this. I think this is a good idea and can't really see an issue. @nordlander please confirm this is OK |
Contributor
|
Definitely ok! |
Contributor
|
@mzagozen will this have a big impact? or switch from .index to .contains and it might make a diff??? would be interesting to hear... |
Collaborator
Author
|
25% in total. Switching to str.contains() is a small part of that, I guess there were many other bools passed around in other places. baseline new compiler with singleton bool new compiler with singleton bool and str.contains() |
Contributor
|
Those are some fantastic gains! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Do not allocate a new B_bool whenever we need an Acton bool!