missing blank line in adafruit_bus_device docs

[2bndy5]

circuitpython/shared-bindings/adafruit_bus_device/SPIDevice.c

Lines 47 to 48 in 5a4a803

	//| Represents a single SPI device and manages locking the bus and the device address.
	//| :param ~busio.SPI spi: The SPI bus the device is on

circuitpython/shared-bindings/adafruit_bus_device/I2CDevice.c

Lines 48 to 49 in 5a4a803

	//| address.
	//| :param ~busio.I2C i2c: The I2C bus the device is on

The first :param: directive needs to be preceded by a blank line. Currently (see above snippets), the parameters are all clumped into 1 paragraph.

I also noticed the busio docs still link to the pure python package's docs. To link to circuitpython's docs, (I think) it would be as easy as removing a intersphinx mapping from the conf.py file.

ps - If not all boards have adafruit_bus_device, it would be nice to see which boards (in the module support matrix) have adafruit_bus_device builtin. However, that might be a more complicated solution given that the matrix seems to be generated with a py script (I think). So, that should probably be a separate issue.

[dhalbert]

ps - If not all boards have adafruit_bus_device, it would be nice to see which boards (in the module support matrix) have adafruit_bus_device builtin. However, that might be a more complicated solution given that the matrix seems to be generated with a py script (I think). So, that should probably be a separate issue.

The presence or absence of adafruit_bus_device is included in the latest (7.0.0) docs. There is also a very nice dynamic search capability: https://circuitpython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/shared-bindings/support_matrix.html.

If you would like to submit a simple PR for the doc errors, that would be great. If not, we can do it.

[2bndy5]

The presence or absence of adafruit_bus_device is included in the latest (7.0.0) docs.

Awesome. Thanks.

If you would like to submit a simple PR for the doc errors, that would be great.

I'd be glad to submit a PR for this.