-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
style: fix lint errors on main branch #76
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @jbdevprimary, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on resolving minor linting and formatting issues to ensure the continuous integration pipeline passes smoothly. The changes primarily involve organizing type exports, updating Node.js built-in module import paths, and refining code style in a script, all without introducing any functional modifications. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces minor but valuable lint fixes across the codebase. The changes include organizing imports in src/services/index.ts for better readability and updating module imports in scripts/check-expo-compatibility.js to use the node: prefix, which is a modern best practice for clarity. Several formatting adjustments are also included, contributing to a more consistent code style. Overall, these changes are positive, improve code quality, and I approve of them.
|
🚀 Expo preview is ready!
|
- Organize imports in src/services/index.ts - Fix unused variable in check-expo-compatibility.js Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
26bec4d to
83ecebf
Compare
|



Summary
Small lint fix to allow CI to pass on other PRs.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code