Search for <=> (literally)
#1661
Answered
by
ahrm
SuperCowProducts
asked this question in
Q&A
|
From trying to do this I was pleased to discover we have some handy macros for fancy unicode math symbols, although I think if we're copying a string then it should stay as the literal result. Did I miss a way to search for this? Also I tried searching for |
Answered by
ahrm
Aug 2, 2026
Replies: 1 comment
|
Searching for the actual |
0 replies
Answer selected by
SuperCowProducts
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Searching for the actual
⇔symbol works, searching for<=>doesn't work (and why would it? The document doesn't contain that text).