Bump rich from 14.3.3 to 15.0.0

[dependabot]

Bumps rich from 14.3.3 to 15.0.0.

Release notes

Sourced from rich's releases.

The So Long 3.8 Release

A few fixes. The major version bump is to honor the passing of 3.8 support which reached its EOL in October 7, 2024

[15.0.0] - 2026-04-12

Changed

• Breaking change: Dropped support for Python3.8

Fixed

• Fixed empty print ignoring the end parameter Textualize/rich#4075
• Fixed Text.from_ansi removing newlines Textualize/rich#4076
• Fixed FileProxy.isatty not proxying Textualize/rich#4077
• Fixed inline code in Markdown tables cells Textualize/rich#4079

The Faster Startup Release

No new features in this release, but there should be improved startup time for Rich apps, and potentially improved runtime if you have a lot of links.

[14.3.4] - 2026-04-11

Changed

• Improved import time with lazy loading Textualize/rich#4070
• Changed link id generation to avoid random number generation at runtime Textualize/rich#3845

Changelog

Sourced from rich's changelog.

[15.0.0] - 2026-04-12

Changed

• Breaking change: Dropped support for Python3.8

Fixed

• Fixed empty print ignoring the end parameter Textualize/rich#4075
• Fixed Text.from_ansi removing newlines Textualize/rich#4076
• Fixed FileProxy.isatty not proxying Textualize/rich#4077
• Fixed inline code in Markdown tables cells Textualize/rich#4079

[14.3.4] - 2026-04-11

Changed

• Improved import time with lazy loading Textualize/rich#4070
• Changed link id generation to avoid random number generation at runtime Textualize/rich#3845

Commits

• 6ac483c correction
• 458a910 Merge pull request #4080 from Textualize/bump1500
• 82e06e0 changelog
• d6556bc bump to 15.0.0
• ffe2edc Merge pull request #4079 from Textualize/inline-table-code
• cf3b5a1 changelog
• 77f0edb remove comments
• 7ef2d05 fix inline code in table cells
• 19c67b9 Merge pull request #4077 from Textualize/isattry
• 494b795 changelog
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.20%. Comparing base (4f58585) to head (2245e01).
⚠️ Report is 31 commits behind head on 3.14.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             3.14   #12480   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.20%   98.20%           
=======================================
  Files         135      135           
  Lines       47121    47132   +11     
  Branches     2525     2526    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        46273    46284   +11     
  Misses        671      671           
  Partials      177      177           

Flag	Coverage Δ
CI-GHA	98.26% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
OS-Linux	98.02% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
OS-Windows	95.66% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
OS-macOS	97.20% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.10.11	96.69% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.10.20	97.17% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.11.15	97.45% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.11.9	96.98% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.12.10	97.06% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.12.13	97.53% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.13.13	97.75% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.14.4	97.80% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.14.4t	96.83% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-pypy3.11.15-7.3.21	96.67% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
VM-macos	97.20% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
VM-ubuntu	98.02% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
VM-windows	95.66% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
cython-coverage	38.09% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 19.82%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 66 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 4 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	test_ten_streamed_responses_iter_chunks[pyloop]	121.1 ms	151 ms	-19.82%

---

_{Comparing dependabot/pip/3.14/rich-15.0.0 (2245e01) with 3.14 (299693b)²}

Footnotes

1. 4 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on 3.14 (e1dc665) during the generation of this report, so 299693b was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩