test(deployment): guard the legacy deploy-linux e2e behind the onboarding redesign flag

[baktun14]

Why

The Deploy App → Test beta (NA) / Test staging e2e job started failing on the first run after #3443 merged to main. tests/ui/deploy-linux.spec.ts drives the legacy /deploy-linux builder and clicks the "OS image" combobox (PlainLinuxPage.tsx:6). #3443 makes /deploy-linux redirect to /new-deployment/configure?vm=true when onboarding_redesign_v1 is on (it is on in beta), where that selector is a "Distribution" combobox instead, so the click times out:

[chromium] › tests/ui/deploy-linux.spec.ts:9:5 › ssh keys generation
  TimeoutError: locator.click: Timeout 15000ms exceeded.
  - waiting for getByRole('combobox', { name: /os image/i })

deploy-linux.spec.ts is the only legacy builder spec that #3443's redirect superseded without adding the skipIfOnboardingRedesign guard its siblings already use (managed-wallet-deployment.spec.ts, managed-wallet-onboarding.spec.ts).

Ref CON-675 (already closed by #3443; this fixes the e2e fallout).

What

Add a module-level beforeEach to deploy-linux.spec.ts calling the existing skipIfOnboardingRedesign helper, mirroring the sibling legacy specs. No production code changes.

• Flag on (beta): the spec skips, matching every other superseded legacy flow, so the job goes green.
• Flag off: the spec runs the legacy builder unchanged, preserving coverage until the legacy builder is retired.

Porting the VM/SSH e2e to the new configure flow is deferred as a follow-up (tracked in CON-685), as #3443 stated.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 5f95b71f-42c4-45d5-a15b-4a88b9c74ab1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 86030e6 and 3ef1a20.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• apps/deploy-web/tests/ui/deploy-linux.spec.ts

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Linux deployment UI spec imports skipIfOnboardingRedesign and invokes it in a test.beforeEach hook before each test runs.

Changes

Linux deployment UI test

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Onboarding redesign setup apps/deploy-web/tests/ui/deploy-linux.spec.ts	The spec applies skipIfOnboardingRedesign(page) before each test, preserving the existing SSH key generation assertions outside the onboarding redesign flow.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• akash-network/console#3443: Updates the /deploy-linux UI test to skip the onboarding redesign path when the feature flag is enabled.

Suggested labels: size: S

Suggested reviewers: ygrishajev

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch test/deployment-guard-deploy-linux-e2e-flag

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 71.82%. Comparing base (86030e6) to head (3ef1a20).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3450      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.92%   71.82%   -1.10%     
==========================================
  Files        1170     1080      -90     
  Lines       29665    27319    -2346     
  Branches     7363     6909     -454     
==========================================
- Hits        21632    19623    -2009     
+ Misses       7064     6757     -307     
+ Partials      969      939      -30     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
api	85.95% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 86030e6
deploy-web	62.01% <ø> (ø)
log-collector	?
notifications	91.44% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 86030e6
provider-console	81.38% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 86030e6
provider-inventory	?
provider-proxy	86.42% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 86030e6
tx-signer	?

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.
see 90 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Auto-approved: all changes are related to tests.