Replies: 5 comments 4 replies
|
Hi, please tell me more detailed information about the computational conditions including
|
|
Dear Dr. Tadano,
I have been unable to solve the following two problems regarding my calculation son monolayer InS.
1. Discussion 131 (#131) - How to solve the memory issue while using alm calculator in Harmonic phonon calculations?
2. We find an oscillating behavior in the lattice cubic thermal conductivity while checking convergence w.r.t. q grid. PFA the graph. Also, the value of Kl is not same as that of literature. I know we use Finite displacement method and fit it to OLS and then solve BTE within RTA. Does this differ from codes like Phonopy and ShengBTE? If so, how? What could give rise to such an oscillating behavior in convergence?
Please help!
Best regards,
Eesha
1.
…________________________________
From: Terumasa TADANO ***@***.***>
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2022 11:07 PM
To: ttadano/alamode ***@***.***>
Cc: Eesha Sanjay Andharia ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [ttadano/alamode] Not able to include analytical corrections for SCPH bands calculations (Discussion #86)
Hi, please tell me more detailed information about the computational conditions including
* supercell size for harmonic and anharmonic IFC calculations
* KMESH_SCPH and KMESH_INTERPOLATE
* NONANALYTIC option (1 or 2)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#86 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZRPMOL64IW2QAWBVPLUAN3V23WQZANCNFSM56WNLF3A>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
Okay! Thank you, Dr. Tadano!
But, this value is not similar to that of literature although it has been obtained by solving BTE equation (Literature values using ShengBTE is 0.4 and 0.55). But the third order Kl I obtain is 0.9 W/mK.
If I want to explain or highlight how our alculations may be different then literature, what can I state in the paper? Any pointers?
Best regards,
Eesha
…________________________________
From: Terumasa TADANO ***@***.***>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 6:31 AM
To: ttadano/alamode ***@***.***>
Cc: Eesha Sanjay Andharia ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [ttadano/alamode] Not able to include analytical corrections for SCPH bands calculations (Discussion #86)
Hi,
About the memory issue, please have a look at #47 (comment)<#47 (comment)>.
The kL value tends to be slighly larger when an odd number is used for the q grid. So, increasing the number of q point sampling one-by-one can lead to an oscillatory behavior.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#86 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZRPMOOYDIXKVAHQGJBVLMLX4FTQNANCNFSM56WNLF3A>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
Dear Dr. Tadano,
Our layer thickness is higher than that of literature. Thank you for the prompt response.
Best regards,
Eesha
…________________________________
From: Terumasa TADANO ***@***.***>
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 2:31 AM
To: ttadano/alamode ***@***.***>
Cc: Eesha Sanjay Andharia ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [ttadano/alamode] Not able to include analytical corrections for SCPH bands calculations (Discussion #86)
When the same computational parameters and force constants are used, both codes should give very similar results at least within the RTA (3ph) level.
Please examine if your computational settings and those of the mentioned previous work are consistent with each other. For 2D, you will also need to use the same value of the layer thickness.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#86 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZRPMOPEY35O42WCBA52P7TX4PI4BANCNFSM56WNLF3A>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
Dear Dr. Tadano, &general &interaction &optimize &cell &cutoff &position Also, it there a way to run alm in parallel? Change partition if needed#SBATCH --partition=large-shared Change the following to your allocation ID#SBATCH -A alr105 Set up environment#module reset . /cm/shared/apps/spack/0.17.3/cpu/b/opt/spack/linux-rocky8-zen/gcc-8.5.0/anaconda3-2021.05-q4munrgvh7qp4o7r3nzcdkbuph4z7375/etc/profile.d/conda.sh |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi,
I have tried different values of hyper-parameter alpha ranging from 0.1 to 0.01 and convergence threshold from 1E-5 to 1E-9. But, when I include born effective charges, the results do not converge for all the temperatures. If they converge for 300K, it gives an anomaly in the graph ( a sudden jump in the phonon branches). How to address this problem? What input parameters do I need to change?
Best,
Eesha
All reactions