Conversation
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| strategy: | ||
| matrix: | ||
| page: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there a way we can point it to index and have it check all pages? Worried we'll forget to update this if new pages are added.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i am not sure if there is a good way to do that without also recursively crawling all links within each page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does that lead to many false positives?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can give it a shot. The main issue is that it takes a very long time, but I initially ruled it out when I thought we would run this check for each PR, so I guess it's not as big of an issue if it still works.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3397 +/- ##
=======================================
- Coverage 99.7% 96.2% -3.4%
=======================================
Files 329 329
Lines 32394 32394
=======================================
- Hits 32265 31160 -1105
- Misses 129 1234 +1105
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Pull Request Description
Closes #3364
After creating the pull request: in order to pass the release_notes_updated check you will need to update the "Future Release" section of
docs/source/release_notes.rstto include this pull request by adding :pr:123.