Change wordings that developers are shown

[saswatanand]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the metadata, compliance report templates, and evaluation heuristics for Play Store policy insights. Key changes include clarifying developer liability, updating status and severity action labels, and softening the phrasing of rejection risks. The review feedback suggests correcting a grammatical typo ("apps'" to "app's") in the liability disclaimer and restoring a bold prefix in the compliance report table for visual consistency.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

[gemini-code-assist]

Since the compliance report is generated for a single application (as indicated by {{app_name_id}}), the possessive form should be singular (app's) rather than plural (apps').

Suggested change

	exist. The developer retains sole responsibility and liability for the apps’
	security, data privacy compliance, and final Play Store submission.
	exist. The developer retains sole responsibility and liability for the app’s
	security, data privacy compliance, and final Play Store submission.

[gemini-code-assist]

To maintain consistency with the other rows in the table (which use bold prefixes like **Should Fix**: and **Good to Know**:), the 'Action Required' column for the 'Critical' severity row should also use a bold prefix.

Suggested change

	| **🔴 Critical** | Direct, verified policy violation (e.g., unauthorized data collection/sharing). | Critical action recommended. |
	| **🔴 Critical** | Direct, verified policy violation (e.g., unauthorized data collection/sharing). | **Must Fix**: Critical action recommended. |