ContextLean v0.2.1

ContextLean v0.2.1

Small verification-behavior clarification.

Changed

• Verification reasons about actual test coverage rather than command labels such as "targeted" or "full".
• Reuses already-passed equivalent coverage when no relevant code, test, configuration or environment change occurred.
• Still broadens verification when additional coverage is needed, after failures or unresolved results, or when project rules require it. Project-required repeated checks remain valid.

Validation

• 120 offline tests; Ruff clean
• Four Skill validators; Codex and Claude plugin validation (two existing Claude warnings)
• 74 PASS / 0 PARTIAL / 0 MISSING / 2 INTENTIONALLY REPLACED
• 71/71 permanent semantic facets preserved
• Automatic context: 5,486 bytes, below the unchanged 5,489-byte ceiling
• Audit: 9 PASS / 0 WARNING / 0 ACTION NEEDED; Lean Review: no material findings

A focused Git-backed GPT-5.6 Sol Refactor validation passed submitted, regression and acceptance tests in both conditions. ContextLean ran the six-test coverage once; the redundant equivalent rerun observed during the v0.2.0 investigation was not reproduced.

This is a focused behavioral validation, not evidence of universal performance gains, statistical confidence or causality. The historical v0.2.0 benchmark headline remains unchanged.