Skip to content

Conversation

@jorgepiloto
Copy link
Member

@jorgepiloto jorgepiloto commented Sep 12, 2025

This pull-request fixes some additional warnings raised by the actions-style job due to running it in pedantic mode. See the issues in #829

@jorgepiloto jorgepiloto requested a review from a team as a code owner September 12, 2025 09:03
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci Pipelines maintenance related label Sep 12, 2025
MaxJPRey
MaxJPRey previously approved these changes Sep 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@MaxJPRey MaxJPRey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 15, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.70%. Comparing base (76de576) to head (639c13c).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #830      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.70%   89.70%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          67       67              
  Lines      188022   188022              
  Branches     1339     1339              
==========================================
- Hits       168664   168662       -2     
- Misses      18965    18967       +2     
  Partials      393      393              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jorgepiloto jorgepiloto merged commit 7484381 into main Sep 17, 2025
2 checks passed
@jorgepiloto jorgepiloto deleted the ci/security branch September 17, 2025 08:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci Pipelines maintenance related

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants