Preflight Checklist
Problem Statement
When orchestrating multiple sub-agents for complex analysis tasks (e.g., analyzing 8 feature tracks in a large codebase), all sub-agents share the parent session's 200K token budget and hit the 8192 output token limit.
Real Example:
While building an operational dashboard, I needed 5 sub-agents to analyze database schema, testing patterns, API design, etc. in parallel.
What Happened:
- 3 out of 5 sub-agents exceeded the 8192 token output limit
- Each failure consumed 10-15K tokens from the shared budget before truncation
- Error: "API Error: Claude's response exceeded the 8192 output token maximum"
- Forced to use workaround: sub-agents write to files, return only 500-word summaries
Impact on Workflow:
- Cannot get comprehensive analysis back from sub-agents (truncated)
- Parent token budget exhausted after 3-4 sub-agent failures
- Must run sub-agents sequentially instead of in parallel (5-10x slower)
- Manual file management adds complexity
Current Workaround:
Instruct sub-agents: "Write full analysis to docs/file.md, return only summary" - but this prevents interactive follow-up and adds overhead.
Proposed Solution
Ideal Experience:
When I launch a sub-agent that will generate large output, Claude Code automatically runs it in a separate terminal with its own 200K token budget, then returns the full result to me.
How I'd Interact:
-
Launch sub-agent normally - no change to current workflow:
"Launch a sub-agent to analyze Track 1.0 implementation patterns across 50+ files"
-
Automatic routing - Claude Code detects this will generate 20K+ tokens and says:
"This analysis will generate ~60KB output. I'm running this sub-agent in a separate terminal to preserve our token budget here. Status: [Sub-agent analyzing... 45% complete]"
-
Get full results - Sub-agent completes and I receive:
- Executive summary in current chat (500 words)
- Option to see full output: "Show full analysis" → displays all 60KB
- Results auto-saved to workspace for reference
What I expect:
- Small tasks (<5K tokens) still run instantly in current terminal (no overhead)
- Large tasks automatically get independent context (no manual setup)
- Can launch 5-10 sub-agents in parallel without token exhaustion
- Zero "output exceeded token limit" errors
- Full analysis returned, not truncated
Current workaround that validates this:
I manually instruct sub-agents to write to files - this proves independent execution works, just needs automation.
Alternative Solutions
Alternatives Tried:
-
File-based workaround (CURRENT):
- Sub-agents write full analysis to
docs/analysis.md
- Return only 500-word summary to parent
- Downside: No interactive follow-up, manual file management, breaks conversational flow
-
Sequential sub-agents instead of parallel:
- Run one sub-agent at a time to avoid token budget exhaustion
- Downside: 5-10x slower (hours instead of minutes), defeats purpose of parallelism
-
Split large tasks into smaller chunks:
- Break 60KB analysis into 6 smaller 10KB tasks
- Downside: Loses coherence, overhead of coordination, still hits limits eventually
-
Manual separate terminals (WORKS but tedious):
- Manually open new Claude Code terminal for large tasks
- Copy/paste context and instructions
- Downside: Manual overhead, context loss, not scalable for 5+ sub-agents
Why these aren't sufficient:
The file-based workaround proves the concept works (independent execution), but requires too much manual orchestration. What's needed is automation of what I'm already doing manually - intelligent routing of large tasks to independent contexts.
Ideal solution validates against real usage:
I've successfully used manual separate terminals for deep analysis - confirming this approach works. Just needs to be automated by Claude Code.
Priority
High - Significant impact on productivity
Feature Category
API and model interactions
Use Case Example
Scenario: Building an operational dashboard for an enterprise application with 8 feature tracks (Sensitive Types CRUD, Regex Patterns, Provider Config, Flow Config, User/RBAC, System Settings, Alerts, Compliance).
Step-by-step with current limitations:
-
I start planning: "Analyze the existing codebase to plan Track 1.1 (Regex Pattern Management)"
-
Launch analysis sub-agents:
- Sub-agent 1: "Analyze Track 1.0 implementation patterns (database schema, service layer, controllers)"
- Sub-agent 2: "Analyze existing test patterns and coverage strategy"
- Sub-agent 3: "Review REST API design patterns from similar CRUD features"
- Sub-agent 4: "Examine MapStruct usage for DTO transformations"
- Sub-agent 5: "Identify reusable components and utilities"
-
What happens NOW:
- Sub-agent 1 returns 8,000 tokens → ❌ Error: "Output exceeded 8192 token limit"
- Consumed 12K tokens from my 200K budget before truncation
- Sub-agent 2 returns 6,500 tokens → ✅ Success (but close to limit)
- Sub-agent 3 hits limit → ❌ Another failure, another 10K tokens wasted
- Token budget now at 166K (consumed 34K, got 50% useful output)
- Must run remaining sub-agents sequentially to avoid exhaustion
-
Current workaround:
- Restart: "Write analysis to docs/track-10-analysis.md, return 500-word summary"
- Works, but I can't ask follow-up questions without reading the file manually
- Takes 2-3 hours instead of 30 minutes
How it would work WITH this feature:
-
Same start: "Analyze existing codebase to plan Track 1.1"
-
Launch all 5 sub-agents in parallel (same as before)
-
Claude Code intelligently routes:
- Sub-agent 1 (60KB output expected) → Separate terminal, independent 200K budget
- Sub-agent 2 (40KB output) → Separate terminal
- Sub-agent 3 (45KB output) → Separate terminal
- Sub-agent 4 (30KB output) → Separate terminal
- Sub-agent 5 (15KB output) → Current terminal (small enough)
-
I see progress: "Running 4 sub-agents in parallel terminals... [75% complete]"
-
All return full results:
- Executive summaries in chat (2K tokens total)
- Full analyses available: "Show Track 1.0 analysis" → displays all 60KB
- Zero truncation errors
- My token budget: 198K remaining (only 2K used for summaries)
-
Time saved: 30 minutes vs 2-3 hours (80% reduction)
This is my actual workflow - I do this 2-3 times per week when planning new features.
Additional Context
Related GitHub Issues:
This builds on existing requests but addresses a specific gap:
Technical Considerations:
Context Transfer Strategy:
- Parent → Sub-agent: Task description, relevant file paths, environment variables
- Sub-agent → Parent: Default 500-word summary, full output on demand
- Configurable modes:
full, partial, minimal context copying
Token Budget Allocation:
- Each independent sub-agent: 200K token budget (same as parent)
- Optional: Custom budgets (50K-500K) based on task complexity
- Advanced: Token pooling (5 sub-agents share 1M tokens)
Proof of Concept:
The manual workaround (opening separate terminals) already validates this approach works. Key observations:
- Separate terminals DO provide independent 200K budgets ✅
- Full analysis completes without truncation ✅
- No parent token budget impact ✅
- Only missing: Automation and orchestration intelligence
Implementation Hint:
Could be phased approach:
- Phase 1: Document manual hybrid pattern (works TODAY, zero dev needed)
- Phase 2: Add
execution_mode parameter to Task tool
- Phase 3: Automatic routing based on estimated output size
Similar Features in Other Tools:
- VS Code: Multiple terminal instances with independent contexts
- tmux/screen: Session isolation
- Kubernetes: Pod-level resource limits
ANTHROPIC_FEATURE_REQUEST.md
Preflight Checklist
Problem Statement
When orchestrating multiple sub-agents for complex analysis tasks (e.g., analyzing 8 feature tracks in a large codebase), all sub-agents share the parent session's 200K token budget and hit the 8192 output token limit.
Real Example:
While building an operational dashboard, I needed 5 sub-agents to analyze database schema, testing patterns, API design, etc. in parallel.
What Happened:
Impact on Workflow:
Current Workaround:
Instruct sub-agents: "Write full analysis to docs/file.md, return only summary" - but this prevents interactive follow-up and adds overhead.
Proposed Solution
Ideal Experience:
When I launch a sub-agent that will generate large output, Claude Code automatically runs it in a separate terminal with its own 200K token budget, then returns the full result to me.
How I'd Interact:
Launch sub-agent normally - no change to current workflow:
"Launch a sub-agent to analyze Track 1.0 implementation patterns across 50+ files"
Automatic routing - Claude Code detects this will generate 20K+ tokens and says:
"This analysis will generate ~60KB output. I'm running this sub-agent in a separate terminal to preserve our token budget here. Status: [Sub-agent analyzing... 45% complete]"
Get full results - Sub-agent completes and I receive:
What I expect:
Current workaround that validates this:
I manually instruct sub-agents to write to files - this proves independent execution works, just needs automation.
Alternative Solutions
Alternatives Tried:
File-based workaround (CURRENT):
docs/analysis.mdSequential sub-agents instead of parallel:
Split large tasks into smaller chunks:
Manual separate terminals (WORKS but tedious):
Why these aren't sufficient:
The file-based workaround proves the concept works (independent execution), but requires too much manual orchestration. What's needed is automation of what I'm already doing manually - intelligent routing of large tasks to independent contexts.
Ideal solution validates against real usage:
I've successfully used manual separate terminals for deep analysis - confirming this approach works. Just needs to be automated by Claude Code.
Priority
High - Significant impact on productivity
Feature Category
API and model interactions
Use Case Example
Scenario: Building an operational dashboard for an enterprise application with 8 feature tracks (Sensitive Types CRUD, Regex Patterns, Provider Config, Flow Config, User/RBAC, System Settings, Alerts, Compliance).
Step-by-step with current limitations:
I start planning: "Analyze the existing codebase to plan Track 1.1 (Regex Pattern Management)"
Launch analysis sub-agents:
What happens NOW:
Current workaround:
How it would work WITH this feature:
Same start: "Analyze existing codebase to plan Track 1.1"
Launch all 5 sub-agents in parallel (same as before)
Claude Code intelligently routes:
I see progress: "Running 4 sub-agents in parallel terminals... [75% complete]"
All return full results:
Time saved: 30 minutes vs 2-3 hours (80% reduction)
This is my actual workflow - I do this 2-3 times per week when planning new features.
Additional Context
Related GitHub Issues:
This builds on existing requests but addresses a specific gap:
Technical Considerations:
Context Transfer Strategy:
full,partial,minimalcontext copyingToken Budget Allocation:
Proof of Concept:
The manual workaround (opening separate terminals) already validates this approach works. Key observations:
Implementation Hint:
Could be phased approach:
execution_modeparameter to Task toolSimilar Features in Other Tools:
ANTHROPIC_FEATURE_REQUEST.md