Replace boolean with enum for table locks in 3.1 #4297
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Instead of using a boolean value for obtaining table locks, use an enum which makes the code more readable and makes it easier to search and catch errors with the lock type. This closes apache#4276
Contributor
Author
|
This current PR is for main, I'll fix the conflicts when merging into elasticity after this is merged to main |
Contributor
Author
|
Actually in elasticity virtually everything is a conflict so it will be simpler to merge this forward as an empty commit and then just do a separate PR for elasticity, #4298 |
cshannon
changed the title
keith-turner
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2024
server/manager/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/manager/tableOps/Utils.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instead of using a boolean value for obtaining table locks, use an enum which makes the code more readable and makes it easier to search and catch errors with the lock type. The enum used already existed in DistributedReadWriteLock.
This closes #4276