Skip to content

Conversation

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Dec 30, 2021

Part of #19891


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in UPDATING.md.

@potiuk potiuk requested a review from turbaszek as a code owner December 30, 2021 00:26
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:providers provider:google Google (including GCP) related issues labels Dec 30, 2021
@potiuk potiuk requested review from eladkal, kaxil and mik-laj December 30, 2021 00:26
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the fix-google-dataproc-mypy-errors branch 2 times, most recently from dfb6718 to 4930a84 Compare December 30, 2021 01:55
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the fix-google-dataproc-mypy-errors branch from 4930a84 to 9c1c7f6 Compare December 30, 2021 12:24
@github-actions github-actions bot added the okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests label Dec 30, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because it does not modify the core of Airflow. If the committers decide that the full tests matrix is needed, they will add the label 'full tests needed'. Then you should rebase to the latest main or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.

@potiuk potiuk merged commit bd9e8ce into apache:main Dec 30, 2021
@potiuk potiuk deleted the fix-google-dataproc-mypy-errors branch December 30, 2021 14:08
@potiuk potiuk restored the fix-google-dataproc-mypy-errors branch April 26, 2022 20:48
@potiuk potiuk deleted the fix-google-dataproc-mypy-errors branch July 29, 2022 20:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:providers okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests provider:google Google (including GCP) related issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants