-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16.4k
Serialize mapped tasks and task groups #20743
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2a54e63
Basic serialization support for MappedOperators
ashb 8951268
Serialization support for TaskGroups
ashb 592b8eb
Tweak type hints to reflect reality
uranusjr 4e3aac7
fixup! Basic serialization support for MappedOperators
ashb 08c4236
fixup! Basic serialization support for MappedOperators
ashb d823958
Adjust to changes on main
ashb c7662ad
Make downstream_task_ids a normal writeable property
ashb 9439378
Handle `task_id` specially in apply_defaults
ashb 5225ad0
Update airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py
ashb 5a890ee
Update airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py
ashb 5702811
Update airflow/models/baseoperator.py
ashb 2737142
Update airflow/models/baseoperator.py
ashb 4d1c222
fixup! Update airflow/models/baseoperator.py
ashb 26ce6d3
Fix usages of the old _[up|down]stream_task_ids
uranusjr e70062d
Remove task_id from kwargs only in MappedOperator
uranusjr File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I’m assuming many of these defaults (this,
_is_dummy, andtemplate_fields, I believe) don’t need to consider whenoperator_classis a str because in that case these values would’ve been supplied explicitly instead. (It’s kind of bad it’s designed this way but I guess that can be said for many things regarding the current serialisation implementation...)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, exactly that. I've already started thinking in my head about how to refactor/rearchitect the serialization and deserialization.