Better cleanup LazyDictWithCache and ProviderManager

[Taragolis]

This changes most attempt to fix cleanup ProviderManager, which I guess only use in tests.
Right now it might keep some values between the test as result it might not unwrap some values.

Sample for demonstrate it

class TestFoo:
    def test_http(self, cleanup_providers_manager):
        from airflow.providers_manager import ProvidersManager

        manager = ProvidersManager()
        hooks = manager.hooks
        info = hooks["http"]
        assert not callable(info)
        assert "http" in hooks._resolved

    def test_aws(self, cleanup_providers_manager):
        from airflow.providers_manager import ProvidersManager

        manager = ProvidersManager()
        hooks = manager.hooks
        info = hooks["aws"]
        assert not callable(info)
        assert "aws" in hooks._resolved
        assert "http" not in hooks._resolved

    def test_aws_again(self):
        from airflow.providers_manager import ProvidersManager

        manager = ProvidersManager()
        assert manager.hooks["aws"].package_name

and result

❯ pytest tests/test_spam.py::TestFoo
================================================ test session starts ================================================
platform darwin -- Python 3.9.10, pytest-7.4.4, pluggy-1.4.0 -- /Users/taragolis/.pyenv/versions/3.9.10/envs/airflow-dev-env-39/bin/python
cachedir: .pytest_cache
rootdir: /Users/taragolis/Projects/common/airflow
configfile: pyproject.toml
plugins: cov-5.0.0, instafail-0.5.0, timeouts-1.2.1, anyio-4.3.0, custom-exit-code-0.3.0, rerunfailures-14.0, icdiff-0.9, xdist-3.5.0, time-machine-2.14.1, asyncio-0.23.6, mock-3.14.0, requests-mock-1.12.1
asyncio: mode=strict
setup timeout: 0.0s, execution timeout: 0.0s, teardown timeout: 0.0s
collected 3 items                                                                                                   

tests/test_spam.py::TestFoo::test_http PASSED                                                                 [ 33%]
tests/test_spam.py::TestFoo::test_aws FAILED                                                                  [ 66%]
tests/test_spam.py::TestFoo::test_aws_again FAILED                                                            [100%]

===================================================== FAILURES ======================================================
_________________________________________________ TestFoo.test_aws __________________________________________________

self = <tests.test_spam.TestFoo object at 0x10519ef70>, cleanup_providers_manager = None

    def test_aws(self, cleanup_providers_manager):
        from airflow.providers_manager import ProvidersManager
    
        manager = ProvidersManager()
        hooks = manager.hooks
        info = hooks["aws"]
        assert not callable(info)
        assert "aws" in hooks._resolved
>       assert "http" not in hooks._resolved
E       AssertionError: assert 'http' not in {'aws', 'http'}
E        +  where {'aws', 'http'} = <airflow.providers_manager.LazyDictWithCache object at 0x10994dfd0>._resolved

tests/test_spam.py:19: AssertionError
______________________________________________ TestFoo.test_aws_again _______________________________________________

self = <tests.test_spam.TestFoo object at 0x1051bd310>

    def test_aws_again(self):
        from airflow.providers_manager import ProvidersManager
    
        manager = ProvidersManager()
>       assert manager.hooks["aws"].package_name
E       AttributeError: 'functools.partial' object has no attribute 'package_name'

tests/test_spam.py:25: AttributeError
============================================== short test summary info ==============================================
FAILED tests/test_spam.py::TestFoo::test_aws - AssertionError: assert 'http' not in {'aws', 'http'}
FAILED tests/test_spam.py::TestFoo::test_aws_again - AttributeError: 'functools.partial' object has no attribute 'package_name'
============================================ 2 failed, 1 passed in 1.79s ============================================

---

^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

[potiuk]

Nice :)