Add cross reference for Edge Executor in Airflow docs#43136
Merged
kaxil merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom Oct 18, 2024
Merged
Add cross reference for Edge Executor in Airflow docs#43136kaxil merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
kaxil merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
Follow-up of apache#42051 . After merging to main, I built docs for edge executor and pushed the inventory file to s3, so it is Airflow docs and can understand where the cross-ref is coming from since it downloads the inventory file.
Lee-W
approved these changes
Oct 18, 2024
Contributor
|
Aaaah, @kaxil THANKS very much! I was scratching my head why the other PR always failed. I actually did not want to add this cross-reference first-hand but remember that some pre-commit check forced me for consistentcy to add it. Good that you resolved this! |
harjeevanmaan
pushed a commit
to harjeevanmaan/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2024
Follow-up of apache#42051 . After merging to main, I built docs for edge executor and pushed the inventory file to s3, so it is Airflow docs and can understand where the cross-ref is coming from since it downloads the inventory file.
PaulKobow7536
pushed a commit
to PaulKobow7536/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2024
Follow-up of apache#42051 . After merging to main, I built docs for edge executor and pushed the inventory file to s3, so it is Airflow docs and can understand where the cross-ref is coming from since it downloads the inventory file.
ellisms
pushed a commit
to ellisms/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2024
Follow-up of apache#42051 . After merging to main, I built docs for edge executor and pushed the inventory file to s3, so it is Airflow docs and can understand where the cross-ref is coming from since it downloads the inventory file.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up of #42051 . After merging to main, I built docs for edge executor and pushed the inventory file to s3 (to s3://airflow-docs --> the one backing https://s.apache.org/airflow-docs/), so it is Airflow docs and can understand where the cross-ref is coming from since it downloads the inventory file.
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.