Fix checking if sources are mounted in breeze image#48499
Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom Mar 28, 2025
Merged
Conversation
The check for mounted sources in the breeze image checked for presence of "airflow" folder, but this folder is now mounted via __init__.py and version check so we have to check for presence of another file (__main__.py).
potiuk
force-pushed
the
fix-checking-for-mounted-sources
branch
from
a0466f3 to
c20a8fa
Compare
pankajkoti
approved these changes
Mar 28, 2025
Member
pankajkoti
left a comment
pankajkoti
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks you so much for fixing this together with #48495 👏🏽 🙇🏽♂️
pankajkoti
pushed a commit
to astronomer/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2025
The check for mounted sources in the breeze image checked for presence of "airflow" folder, but this folder is now mounted via __init__.py and version check so we have to check for presence of another file (__main__.py).
shubham-pyc
pushed a commit
to shubham-pyc/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2025
The check for mounted sources in the breeze image checked for presence of "airflow" folder, but this folder is now mounted via __init__.py and version check so we have to check for presence of another file (__main__.py).
nailo2c
pushed a commit
to nailo2c/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2025
The check for mounted sources in the breeze image checked for presence of "airflow" folder, but this folder is now mounted via __init__.py and version check so we have to check for presence of another file (__main__.py).
simonprydden
pushed a commit
to simonprydden/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2025
The check for mounted sources in the breeze image checked for presence of "airflow" folder, but this folder is now mounted via __init__.py and version check so we have to check for presence of another file (__main__.py).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The check for mounted sources in the breeze image checked for presence of "airflow" folder, but this folder is now mounted via init.py and version check so we have to check for presence of another file (main.py).
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.