Skip to content

Conversation

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Oct 26, 2025

The "check-provider-yaml-valid" check has been partially broken after we moved providers to "providers" directory. The problem was that consistency between available howtos and logos has not been checked properly. This resulted in documentation not having links to all the howto guides and some logos not used. It has been revealed after we moved .pre-commit-config to providers folder.

This PR fixes the script that checks for validity and fixes all found discrepancies.


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

The "check-provider-yaml-valid" check has been partially broken
after we moved providers to "providers" directory. The problem was
that consistency between available howtos and logos has not been
checked properly. This resulted in documentation not having links
to all the howto guides and some logos not used. It has been
revealed after we moved .pre-commit-config to providers folder.

This PR fixes the script that checks for validity and fixes all
found discrepancies.
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the fix-discrepancies-in-provider-yaml branch from d901586 to cb1d766 Compare October 26, 2025 08:40
@potiuk potiuk merged commit 46f4755 into apache:main Oct 26, 2025
92 of 94 checks passed
@potiuk potiuk deleted the fix-discrepancies-in-provider-yaml branch October 26, 2025 09:22
Copy link
Contributor

@amoghrajesh amoghrajesh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants