Skip to content

docs: clearer comment on multi-tenancy in the execution API#64246

Open
raboof wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
raboof:execution-api-placeholder-references
Open

docs: clearer comment on multi-tenancy in the execution API#64246
raboof wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
raboof:execution-api-placeholder-references

Conversation

@raboof
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@raboof raboof commented Mar 26, 2026

Without this the invalid security reports will just keep coming.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes (please specify the tool below)

  • Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
  • For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
  • When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
  • For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@amoghrajesh amoghrajesh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This and other places, otherwise looks good.

Comment on lines +43 to +44
# The current version of Airflow does not support true
# multi-tenancy yet (this is well-documented at
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
# The current version of Airflow does not support true
# multi-tenancy yet (this is well-documented at
# The current version of Airflow does not support
# multi-tenancy yet (this is well-documented at

Without this the invalid security reports will just keep
coming.
@raboof raboof force-pushed the execution-api-placeholder-references branch from a2e8216 to 59d8785 Compare March 27, 2026 11:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants