Merged
Conversation
bbovenzi
requested review from
amoghrajesh,
ashb,
choo121600,
jason810496,
jscheffl,
kaxil,
potiuk and
shahar1
as code owners
jscheffl
approved these changes
Apr 6, 2026
Contributor
jscheffl
left a comment
jscheffl
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the past also I remember there were comments about useEffect() - shall this be added here as well?
potiuk
reviewed
Apr 6, 2026
bbovenzi
requested review from
guan404ming,
pierrejeambrun,
ryanahamilton,
shubhamraj-git and
vatsrahul1001
as code owners
Contributor
Author
I linked the previous documentation here so that its included without repeating ourselves. |
shivaam
pushed a commit
to shivaam/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2026
* Update Agents.md for UI dev * Move to UI directory with link to existing docs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In reviewing PRs, I noticed some consistent areas where AI tools were making mistakes, including copilot giving bad advice in PR reviews. This should help fix some of them, and reinforce our code standards.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
{pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.