Skip newsfragment check on label events to avoid approval requirement#64901
Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom Apr 8, 2026
Merged
Skip newsfragment check on label events to avoid approval requirement#64901potiuk merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
potiuk merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
The `labeled`/`unlabeled` event types triggered this workflow when boring-cyborg bot added labels, which required manual approval to run. Since this check only needs to run on code changes (opened, reopened, synchronize), removing the label event types avoids unnecessary workflow runs that need approval.
eladkal
approved these changes
Apr 8, 2026
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2026
… requirement (#64901) The `labeled`/`unlabeled` event types triggered this workflow when boring-cyborg bot added labels, which required manual approval to run. Since this check only needs to run on code changes (opened, reopened, synchronize), removing the label event types avoids unnecessary workflow runs that need approval. (cherry picked from commit 40902de) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Backport successfully created: v3-2-testNote: As of Merging PRs targeted for Airflow 3.X In matter of doubt please ask in #release-management Slack channel.
|
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to aws-mwaa/upstream-to-airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2026
… requirement (apache#64901) The `labeled`/`unlabeled` event types triggered this workflow when boring-cyborg bot added labels, which required manual approval to run. Since this check only needs to run on code changes (opened, reopened, synchronize), removing the label event types avoids unnecessary workflow runs that need approval. (cherry picked from commit 40902de) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
potiuk
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2026
… requirement (#64901) The `labeled`/`unlabeled` event types triggered this workflow when boring-cyborg bot added labels, which required manual approval to run. Since this check only needs to run on code changes (opened, reopened, synchronize), removing the label event types avoids unnecessary workflow runs that need approval. (cherry picked from commit 40902de) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
potiuk
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2026
… requirement (#64901) (#64903) The `labeled`/`unlabeled` event types triggered this workflow when boring-cyborg bot added labels, which required manual approval to run. Since this check only needs to run on code changes (opened, reopened, synchronize), removing the label event types avoids unnecessary workflow runs that need approval. (cherry picked from commit 40902de) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Remove
labeledandunlabeledevent types from the newsfragment PR numbercheck workflow trigger. When boring-cyborg bot adds labels to PRs, it triggers
this workflow which then requires manual approval to run — adding unnecessary
noise. Since the newsfragment check only needs to run on actual code changes
(opened, reopened, synchronize), removing label events avoids these unnecessary
workflow runs.
The
skip newsfragment checklabel still works as before — it's evaluatedat job level via the existing
ifcondition, which runs on the remainingevent types.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
Generated-by: Claude Code (Claude Opus 4.6) following the guidelines