Fix exceptions of positional session use in Edge provider

[jscheffl]

Following PR #67150 this one cleans the exceptions in Edge provider

---

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

• Yes (please specify the tool below)

---

• Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
• For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
• When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
• For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.

[jason810496]

Thanks for the fix! Mypy is not happy with the queue_workload change.

We can't change the BaseExecutor.queue_workload directly, so the only way is to silence Mypy for queue_workload I think.

  providers/edge3/src/airflow/providers/edge3/executors/edge_executor.py:99: error: Signature of "queue_workload" incompatible with supertype "airflow.executors.base_executor.BaseExecutor"  [override]
          def queue_workload(
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  providers/edge3/src/airflow/providers/edge3/executors/edge_executor.py:99: note:      Superclass:
  providers/edge3/src/airflow/providers/edge3/executors/edge_executor.py:99: note:          def queue_workload(self, workload: ExecuteTask | ExecuteCallback, session: Session) -> None
  providers/edge3/src/airflow/providers/edge3/executors/edge_executor.py:99: note:      Subclass:
  providers/edge3/src/airflow/providers/edge3/executors/edge_executor.py:99: note:          def queue_workload(self, workload: ExecuteTask | ExecuteCallback | RunTrigger, *, session: Session = ...) -> None
  Found 1 error in 1 file (checked 4503 source files)

[github-actions]

Backport failed to create: v3-2-test. View the failure log Run details

Note: As of Merging PRs targeted for Airflow 3.X
the committer who merges the PR is responsible for backporting the PRs that are bug fixes (generally speaking) to the maintenance branches.

In matter of doubt please ask in #release-management Slack channel.

Status	Branch	Result
❌	v3-2-test

You can attempt to backport this manually by running:

cherry_picker a5f73bb v3-2-test

This should apply the commit to the v3-2-test branch and leave the commit in conflict state marking
the files that need manual conflict resolution.

After you have resolved the conflicts, you can continue the backport process by running:

cherry_picker --continue

If you don't have cherry-picker installed, see the installation guide.

[jscheffl]

Args, oh, should not be back-ported...