Skip to content

[v3-2-test] Speed up TaskGroup.topological_sort with int-indexed projected sweep (#67288)#67687

Merged
vatsrahul1001 merged 2 commits into
apache:v3-2-testfrom
shahar1:backport-67288-v3-2-test
May 29, 2026
Merged

[v3-2-test] Speed up TaskGroup.topological_sort with int-indexed projected sweep (#67288)#67687
vatsrahul1001 merged 2 commits into
apache:v3-2-testfrom
shahar1:backport-67288-v3-2-test

Conversation

@shahar1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@shahar1 shahar1 commented May 29, 2026

Backport of #67288 to v3-2-test.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes — Claude Code (Haiku 4.5)

@shahar1 shahar1 changed the title Speed up TaskGroup.topological_sort with int-indexed projected sweep (backport #67288) [v3-2-test] Speed up TaskGroup.topological_sort with int-indexed projected sweep (#67288) May 29, 2026
@shahar1 shahar1 marked this pull request as draft May 29, 2026 08:11
These tests depend on TaskGroup.__getitem__ and NodeNotFound exception
which don't exist in v3-2-test. Keep topological_sort shape correctness
tests which are for the actual optimization.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@shahar1 shahar1 marked this pull request as ready for review May 29, 2026 08:59
@vatsrahul1001 vatsrahul1001 merged commit a4c811c into apache:v3-2-test May 29, 2026
158 of 163 checks passed
@shahar1 shahar1 deleted the backport-67288-v3-2-test branch May 29, 2026 12:24
vatsrahul1001 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2026
…ected sweep (#67288) (#67687)

* Speed up TaskGroup.topological_sort with int-indexed projected sweep (backport #67288)

* Remove __getitem__ and NodeNotFound tests not available in v3-2-test

These tests depend on TaskGroup.__getitem__ and NodeNotFound exception
which don't exist in v3-2-test. Keep topological_sort shape correctness
tests which are for the actual optimization.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants