Skip to content

[AIRFLOW-XXXX] clarify dag_id parameter#7463

Merged
kaxil merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
MichaelChirico:dag-id-doc
Feb 22, 2020
Merged

[AIRFLOW-XXXX] clarify dag_id parameter#7463
kaxil merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
MichaelChirico:dag-id-doc

Conversation

@MichaelChirico
Copy link
Contributor

@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico commented Feb 19, 2020

[AIRFLOW-XXXX]

Re-filing #7462 here:

I spent a while chasing this just now, wondering whether : is valid before finding validate_key() in helpers.

I think it's helpful to surface this here directly.

Trivial change so eschewing the other formality required in the PR template

@zhongjiajie
Copy link
Member

@MichaelChirico Not only your PR title, but also your git commit message.

you could change and then force push to restart validator

I spent a while chasing this just now, wondering whether `:` is valid before finding `validate_key()` in helpers.

I think it's helpful to surface this here directly.
@MichaelChirico
Copy link
Contributor Author

failure seems unrelated:

The job exceeded the maximum time limit for jobs, and has been terminated.

@kaxil kaxil merged commit f90c25e into apache:master Feb 22, 2020
@boring-cyborg
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Feb 22, 2020

Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!

@kaxil
Copy link
Member

kaxil commented Feb 22, 2020

Thanks @MichaelChirico 🎉

@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico deleted the dag-id-doc branch February 22, 2020 00:36
@MichaelChirico
Copy link
Contributor Author

Of course now that it's merged I just noticed that exclusively is used twice 🤦‍♂ @kaxil

@kaxil
Copy link
Member

kaxil commented Feb 22, 2020

Of course now that it's merged I just noticed that exclusively is used twice 🤦‍♂ @kaxil

I missed it as well :) Want to submit another PR fixing it?

galuszkak pushed a commit to FlyrInc/apache-airflow that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2020
I spent a while chasing this just now, wondering whether `:` is valid before finding `validate_key()` in helpers.

I think it's helpful to surface this here directly.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants