Add jdeb support where missing#1323
Conversation
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
adoroszlai
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @nareshgbhat, thanks for the contribution.
Can you please incorporate all jdeb-related changes (#1319, #1320, #1322) in this single pull request? The rationale is that they can only be tested together. Running jdeb:jdeb on individual modules results in:
[INFO] --- jdeb:1.0.1:jdeb (default-cli) @ utility ---
[INFO] skipping sub module: jdeb executing at top-level only
utility/pom.xml
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
<plugin> is missing here, causing:
[FATAL] Non-parseable POM utility/pom.xml: Unrecognised tag: 'groupId' (position: START_TAG seen ...<plugins>\n <groupId>... @61:18) @ line 61, column 18
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My apologies for late reply. Sure, I will make the necessary changes and give a single pull request. Thank you very much for suggestions.
90ab517 to
1aa8f80
Compare
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
@adoroszlai The build failure does not looks like related to changes in my patch. If so please let me know your suggestions. Thanks. |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
I also want to apply the same patch for the branch release-2.6.1 and release-2.6.2 should I create a separate jira issue and give the pull request or can I use the same #1323 thread ? |
|
@nareshgbhat You don't need a seperate Jira issue, but a new pull request is required, since pull requests are specific to a target branch. Also, |
b26564b to
de1fad9
Compare
|
@adoroszlai Thanks I have raised one more pull request for the same patch on v2.6 branch - #1417 |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
Hi @nareshgbhat, I just noticed that #1417 was opened from the same source branch in your repository, and that branch Can you please create a new branch based on In general, if you are planning to apply a change to multiple branches (eg. |
This patch add jdeb (debian) package creation support for the following packages. -ambari-funtest -ambari-logsearch -ambari-metrics-grafana -utility Signed-off-by: Naresh Bhat <naresh.bhat@linaro.org>
|
Done. My apologies for inconvenience. |
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
|
@adoroszlai Thanks for merging the patch. I have noticed that the Author is different in the merged patch Author: Naresh Bhat nareshgbhat@users.noreply.github.com it should be Author: Naresh Bhat naresh.bhat@linaro.org Is it possible to update the patch with git author command ? I am not sure how it got modified. Author: Naresh Bhat naresh.bhat@linaro.org ... After adding description, signoff. Is it possible to cherry-pick the same patch on v2.6 branch ? |
|
To add it to The noreply address is used if "Keep my email address private" is enabled in your settings. I can try choosing "Rebase and merge" next time and see if it keeps the original commit's email address. |
|
@adoroszlai Thank you very much. This is my first patch using github. I will try to avoid mistakes while doing further contribution. I have unchecked the "Keep my email address private" box. I will cherry-pick locally and open a new PR. |
This patch add debian package creation support for utility package.
Signed-off-by: Naresh Bhat naresh.bhat@linaro.org
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add jdeb support to utility component.
How was this patch tested?
Test on Debian-9 installed on AArch64 (branch - release-2.5.2).
Please review Ambari Contributing Guide before opening a pull request.