Skip to content

format: generalize current catalog/schema for arbitrarily nested namespaces #4564

Description

@lidavidm

What feature or improvement would you like to see?

In theory, if a vendor supports arbitrarily nested table namespaces (a la Iceberg catalog), then we should be able to USE a nested namespace too, right?

  • Does any vendor actually support this?
  • How should we represent the namespace to the API, considering escaping?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions