Skip to content

chore: Deprecate ParquetObjectReader / ParquetObjectWriter, add object_store example#10398

Draft
alamb wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:mainfrom
alamb:alamb/deprecate_object_store
Draft

chore: Deprecate ParquetObjectReader / ParquetObjectWriter, add object_store example#10398
alamb wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:mainfrom
alamb:alamb/deprecate_object_store

Conversation

@alamb

@alamb alamb commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Which issue does this PR close?

Rationale for this change

#10354 proposes removing the object_store integration from the parquet crate to slim down the dependency chain.

Removing ParquetObjectReader / ParquetObjectWriter without notice will cause downstream pain , so per this discussion and the deprecation policy we should actually deprecate the API for at least 2 major releases before we remove them

What changes are included in this PR?

  1. Deprecate ParquetObjectReader and ParquetObjectWriter as of version 60.0.0, with notes pointing at the new example
  2. Add parquet/examples/object_store.rs, a runnable, self-contained copy of the reader/writer implementations (and their tests) that users can copy/paste into their own crates

Are these changes tested?

yes by CI

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes: ParquetObjectReader and ParquetObjectWriter are now marked deprecated. No functionality is removed yet.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the parquet Changes to the parquet crate label Jul 20, 2026
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

parquet Changes to the parquet crate

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant