chore: fix typos in code comments - #10943
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
would be neat to have |
mbrobbel
approved these changes
Sep 1, 2026
Jefffrey
approved these changes
Sep 2, 2026
Contributor
|
thanks for this @MsfPablo thanks for review @Rich-T-kid & @mbrobbel typo/spellcheck action might be a nice idea for a followup |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
N/A — small standalone cleanup.
Rationale for this change
codespellturns up a handful of spelling mistakes in doc comments and inline comments. One of them is slightly more than cosmetic: the doc comment onarrow_arith::arity::try_binaryreads "Allies a binary infallable function", which should be "Applies a binary infallible function".What changes are included in this PR?
Comment-only spelling fixes across
arrow-schema,arrow-arith,arrow-ipc,arrow-select, andparquet-variant. No identifiers, public API, or behaviour changed. Generated sources underarrow-ipc/src/gen, changelogs, and test data were left untouched.Are these changes tested?
No tests needed — comments only.
Are there any user-facing changes?
Only rendered rustdoc text.