Skip to content

Conversation

@thisisnic
Copy link
Member

Rationale for this change

Incorrect information in docs

What changes are included in this PR?

Change ref to data.frame to tibble instead

Are these changes tested?

No

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

Copy link
Member

@paleolimbot paleolimbot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably also need devtools::document()?

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review labels Aug 23, 2023
@thisisnic
Copy link
Member Author

Probably also need devtools::document()?

Doesn't need it, find+replace had accidentally replaced the correct value in the .Rd file, so it's a no-op

@kou kou merged commit 6d3cbda into apache:main Aug 23, 2023
@kou kou removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Aug 23, 2023
@conbench-apache-arrow
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 6d3cbda.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

loicalleyne pushed a commit to loicalleyne/arrow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
…tead (apache#37335)

### Rationale for this change

Incorrect information in docs

### What changes are included in this PR?

Change ref to `data.frame` to `tibble` instead

### Are these changes tested?

No
### Are there any user-facing changes?

No

Authored-by: Nic Crane <thisisnic@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants