MINOR: [Docs][Java] Fix wrong method usage in example

[duhanmin]

Rationale for this change

DictionaryProvider doesn't have get method.

What changes are included in this PR?

It should be lookup not get.

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes.

[github-actions]

Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on GitHub? https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/new/choose

Opening GitHub issues ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename the pull request title in the following format?

GH-${GITHUB_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

In the case of PARQUET issues on JIRA the title also supports:

PARQUET-${JIRA_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

• Other pull requests
• Contribution Guidelines - Contributing Overview

[vibhatha]

Thanks for making this PR. LGTM!

[vibhatha]

@github-actions crossbow submit preview-docs

[vibhatha]

@kou @lidavidm shall we make the title name as Minor: Docs Update vector.rst to use lookup instead of get or something meaningful?

[vibhatha]

@kou @lidavidm shall we make the title name as Minor: Docs Update vector.rst to use lookup instead of get or something meaningful?

@duhanmin appreciate if you could make this change 🙂

[github-actions]

Revision: 5151b23

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-effb5b3ff9

Task	Status
preview-docs

[lidavidm]

er, yes, the PR title needs to change as a basic requirement - that goes without saying

[kou]

http://crossbow.voltrondata.com/pr_docs/40940/java/vector.html#dictionary-encoding

[kou]

+1

I've updated the title and description.

[vibhatha]

er, yes, the PR title needs to change as a basic requirement - that goes without saying

Agreed!

Unfortunately I don't have the edit title access.

Thanks @kou 👍

[conbench-apache-arrow]

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 782c52f.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 3 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.