GH-50345: [CI] Remove redundant checkout step from check_labels.yml#50346
Merged
Conversation
|
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Removes an unnecessary repository checkout from the reusable check_labels.yml workflow now that the job no longer depends on fork/repo contents, and instead only queries PR labels via the GitHub CLI.
Changes:
- Removed the conditional
actions/checkoutstep from thecheck-labelsjob. - Left the label-checking logic intact (uses
gh pr viewandGITHUB_OUTPUTonly).
raulcd
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
check_labels.ymlno longer uses fork repository content because GH-50256 removed changed paths based check.What changes are included in this PR?
Remove redundant
actions/checkoutstep.Are these changes tested?
Yes.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.