AVRO-2243 Added support for union types for a given Class without using @Union …#349
Open
vamsi360 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-1.8from
Open
AVRO-2243 Added support for union types for a given Class without using @Union …#349vamsi360 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-1.8from
vamsi360 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-1.8from
Conversation
vamsi360
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…annotation. This is helpful when you cannot statically add @union annotation to a class you want to generate Union subtypes for when using ReflectData.get().getSchema(Class<?>). Added test like @union test and its passing