Skip to content

Conversation

@pabloem
Copy link
Member

@pabloem pabloem commented May 2, 2017

No description provided.

@pabloem pabloem force-pushed the full-remove-agg branch 3 times, most recently from a9710b6 to da85133 Compare May 2, 2017 20:24
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 69.998% when pulling da85133 on pabloem:full-remove-agg into 3bd8a0f on apache:master.

@pabloem pabloem force-pushed the full-remove-agg branch from da85133 to 92c169a Compare May 2, 2017 21:49
@pabloem pabloem force-pushed the full-remove-agg branch from 92c169a to 6bf4ab7 Compare May 2, 2017 21:59
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 6bf4ab7 on pabloem:full-remove-agg into ** on apache:master**.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 69.973% when pulling 6bf4ab7 on pabloem:full-remove-agg into a552fb8 on apache:master.

@pabloem
Copy link
Member Author

pabloem commented May 2, 2017

r: @dhalperi all tests pass. The only thing that is left about aggregators is the class itself. It's not being used anywhere, and it should be removable after the dataflow worker is rebuilt.

@dhalperi
Copy link
Contributor

dhalperi commented May 2, 2017

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants