Skip to content

[BEAM-2508] (2.1.0 cherry-pick) Fix DoFn javadoc: StateSpec does not require a key#3505

Merged
asfgit merged 1 commit intoapache:release-2.1.0from
kennknowles:cherry-pick-stateful-javadoc
Jul 7, 2017
Merged

[BEAM-2508] (2.1.0 cherry-pick) Fix DoFn javadoc: StateSpec does not require a key#3505
asfgit merged 1 commit intoapache:release-2.1.0from
kennknowles:cherry-pick-stateful-javadoc

Conversation

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member

Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution
quickly and easily:

  • Make sure the PR title is formatted like:
    [BEAM-<Jira issue #>] Description of pull request
  • Make sure tests pass via mvn clean verify.
  • Replace <Jira issue #> in the title with the actual Jira issue
    number, if there is one.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache
    Individual Contributor License Agreement.

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

R: @jbonofre

@kennknowles kennknowles changed the title [BEAM-2508] Fix DoFn javadoc: StateSpec does not require a key [BEAM-2508] (2.1.0 cherry-pick) Fix DoFn javadoc: StateSpec does not require a key Jul 6, 2017
@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

retest this please

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling bb23973 on kennknowles:cherry-pick-stateful-javadoc into ** on apache:release-2.1.0**.

Copy link
Member

@jbonofre jbonofre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@asfgit asfgit merged commit bb23973 into apache:release-2.1.0 Jul 7, 2017
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2017
…StateSpec does not require a key

  Fix DoFn javadoc: StateSpec does not require a key
@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks!

@kennknowles kennknowles deleted the cherry-pick-stateful-javadoc branch July 7, 2017 18:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants