Skip to content

ISSUE #507: Introduce @FlakyTest annotation for marking a few tests as flaky#710

Closed
ivankelly wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-4.5from
ivankelly:flakey-4.5
Closed

ISSUE #507: Introduce @FlakyTest annotation for marking a few tests as flaky#710
ivankelly wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-4.5from
ivankelly:flakey-4.5

Conversation

@ivankelly
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Descriptions of the changes in this PR:

  • introduced FlakyTest annotation
  • mark a few tests as flaky tests (create issues for them)

Author: Sijie Guo sijie@apache.org

Reviewers: Jia Zhai

This closes #504 from sijie/mark_test_as_failures, closes #507

Descriptions of the changes in this PR:

(PR description content here)...


Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution
quickly and easily:

  • Make sure the PR title is formatted like:
    <Issue # or BOOKKEEPER-#>: Description of pull request
    e.g. Issue 123: Description ...
    e.g. BOOKKEEPER-1234: Description ...
  • Make sure tests pass via mvn clean apache-rat:check install findbugs:check.
  • Replace <Issue # or BOOKKEEPER-#> in the title with the actual Issue/JIRA number.

…ests as flaky

Descriptions of the changes in this PR:

- introduced FlakyTest annotation
- mark a few tests as flaky tests (create issues for them)

Author: Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org>

Reviewers: Jia Zhai <None>

This closes apache#504 from sijie/mark_test_as_failures, closes apache#507
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@eolivelli eolivelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 this is for 4.5 branch.
The merge script on master handles this case, there is an ENV variable with the target branch.
I can merge this on this evening, if you prefer @ivankelly or @jiazhai you can merge now to see the new results

@asfgit
Copy link
Copy Markdown

asfgit commented Nov 9, 2017

FAILURE

--none--

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jiazhai jiazhai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM

@jiazhai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jiazhai commented Nov 10, 2017

I will have a try

@eolivelli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I am merging this into 4.5

@eolivelli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

are you trying too @jiazhai ?

@jiazhai jiazhai added this to the 4.6.0 milestone Nov 10, 2017
jiazhai pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2017
…s flaky

Descriptions of the changes in this PR:

- introduced FlakyTest annotation
- mark a few tests as flaky tests (create issues for them)

Author: Sijie Guo <sijieapache.org>

Reviewers: Jia Zhai <None>

This closes #504 from sijie/mark_test_as_failures, closes #507

Descriptions of the changes in this PR:

(PR description content here)...

Author: Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org>

Reviewers: Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@gmail.com>, Jia Zhai <None>, Sijie Guo <sijie@apache.org>

This closes #710 from ivankelly/flakey-4.5, closes #507
@jiazhai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jiazhai commented Nov 10, 2017

what a coincidence for us to do it at same time, will close this, since it is merged.

@jiazhai jiazhai closed this Nov 10, 2017
athanatos pushed a commit to athanatos/bookkeeper that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2019
Summary: client-initiated renegotiation is insecure and is vulnerable to MITM attacks.
Unfortunately, the feature is enabled in Java by default. This disables it.
See https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7188658 and
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/documentation/tlsreadme-141115.html

Test Plan: manually tested by running a secure ZK server and probing the listening port
with python's sslyze tool (using `sslyze --reneg ...`). Tested on Java 8, 9, 10, and 11.

Author: Ilya Maykov <ilyam@fb.com>

Reviewers: andor@apache.org

Closes apache#710 from ivmaykov/ZOOKEEPER-3195
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants