Skip to content

[CALCITE-6737] LoptOptimizeJoinRule can not identify selfjoin on unique join keys - #4097

Merged
zabetak merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
kasakrisz:CALCITE-6737-main-selfjoin
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

[CALCITE-6737] LoptOptimizeJoinRule can not identify selfjoin on unique join keys#4097
zabetak merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
kasakrisz:CALCITE-6737-main-selfjoin

Conversation

@kasakrisz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This patch restores the original behavior of {{LoptOptimizeJoinRule.java}} prior #2189

@kasakrisz
kasakrisz marked this pull request as draft December 18, 2024 13:37

@zabetak zabetak left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! The CI failures seem unrelated. I will merge this once we get a green run.

@zabetak

zabetak commented Dec 18, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was wrong the test failures are relevant. It seems that the commit message does not follow the style conventions. Let's fix it and trigger again the run.

@kasakrisz
kasakrisz force-pushed the CALCITE-6737-main-selfjoin branch from a9663fc to 282db67 Compare December 18, 2024 14:59
@kasakrisz kasakrisz changed the title CALCITE-6737: LoptOptimizeJoinRule can not identify selfjoin on unique join keys [CALCITE-6737] LoptOptimizeJoinRule can not identify selfjoin on unique join keys Dec 18, 2024
@kasakrisz
kasakrisz marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 14:59
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@zabetak
zabetak merged commit c1ca226 into apache:main Dec 18, 2024
@kasakrisz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review @zabetak

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants