Skip to content

CAMEL-24130: camel-jpa - JpaMessageIdRepository should not reuse EntityManager from exchange header#24792

Merged
davsclaus merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/CAMEL-24130
Jul 16, 2026
Merged

CAMEL-24130: camel-jpa - JpaMessageIdRepository should not reuse EntityManager from exchange header#24792
davsclaus merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/CAMEL-24130

Conversation

@davsclaus

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

JpaMessageIdRepository hardcodes usePassedInEntityManager=true in all getTargetEntityManager() calls, which causes it to grab the EntityManager from the exchange's CamelEntityManager header. When used downstream of a JPA consumer (which puts its own poll-scoped EM in that header), the repository then closes the consumer's EM in its finally block, causing IllegalStateException: EntityManager is closed during the consumer's subsequent flush/clear.

Fix

Changed usePassedInEntityManager from true to false in all four getTargetEntityManager() calls (add, contains, remove, clear). This makes the repository always create its own EM via its own entityManagerFactory, matching JpaEndpoint's default behavior. The existing finally close logic is then correct — the repository only closes EMs it created itself.

Claude Code on behalf of davsclaus

…tyManager from exchange header

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🌟 Thank you for your contribution to the Apache Camel project! 🌟
🤖 CI automation will test this PR automatically.

🐫 Apache Camel Committers, please review the following items:

  • First-time contributors require MANUAL approval for the GitHub Actions to run
  • You can use the command /component-test (camel-)component-name1 (camel-)component-name2.. to request a test from the test bot although they are normally detected and executed by CI.
  • You can label PRs using skip-tests and test-dependents to fine-tune the checks executed by this PR.
  • Build and test logs are available in the summary page. Only Apache Camel committers have access to the summary.

⚠️ Be careful when sharing logs. Review their contents before sharing them publicly.

@gnodet gnodet left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review: CAMEL-24130 — JpaMessageIdRepository should not reuse EntityManager from exchange header

Verdict: Approve

The fix correctly changes usePassedInEntityManager from true to false in all four getTargetEntityManager() calls (add, contains, remove, clear).

Why this is correct:

JpaMessageIdRepository manages its own EntityManager lifecycle — each method creates an EM, uses it within transactionStrategy.executeInTransaction(), and closes it in the finally block. When usePassedInEntityManager=true, getTargetEntityManager() first checks the exchange header for CamelEntityManager, which the JPA consumer populates with its poll-scoped EM. The repository then closes that EM in its finally block, leaving the consumer with a closed EM for its subsequent flush/clear — causing IllegalStateException: EntityManager is closed.

The usePassedInEntityManager parameter was set to true when CAMEL-18450 refactored the repository to use getTargetEntityManager() (commit bbbb47efd8f3), but this was likely unintentional — the repository previously created its own EM directly via the factory and never reused one from the exchange. Setting it to false restores that self-contained lifecycle.

Notes:

  • The remaining EM resolution path (exchange property → transaction context → shared EM → create new) still works correctly. The allowRecreate=true parameter ensures a closed EM from the exchange property is replaced with a fresh one.
  • Change is minimal and focused — 4 identical boolean flips across the 4 public methods.

Reviewed with Claude Code (claude-code/1.0.3) on behalf of gnodet. This review was generated by an AI agent and may contain inaccuracies; please verify all suggestions before applying.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 CI tested the following changed modules:

  • components/camel-jpa

🔬 Scalpel shadow comparison — Scalpel: 9 tested, 29 compile-only — current: 9 all tested

Maveniverse Scalpel detected 38 affected modules (current approach: 9).

⚠️ Modules only in Scalpel (29)
  • apache-camel
  • camel-allcomponents
  • camel-catalog
  • camel-catalog-console
  • camel-catalog-lucene
  • camel-catalog-maven
  • camel-catalog-suggest
  • camel-componentdsl
  • camel-csimple-maven-plugin
  • camel-endpointdsl
  • camel-endpointdsl-support
  • camel-itest
  • camel-jbang-core
  • camel-jbang-it
  • camel-jbang-main
  • camel-jbang-plugin-edit
  • camel-jbang-plugin-generate
  • camel-jbang-plugin-kubernetes
  • camel-jbang-plugin-test
  • camel-kamelet-main
  • camel-launcher
  • camel-report-maven-plugin
  • camel-route-parser
  • camel-yaml-dsl
  • camel-yaml-dsl-deserializers
  • camel-yaml-dsl-maven-plugin
  • coverage
  • docs
  • dummy-component

Skip-tests mode would test 9 modules (1 direct + 8 downstream), skip tests for 29 (generated code, meta-modules)

Modules Scalpel would test (9)
  • camel-jbang-mcp
  • camel-jbang-plugin-mcp
  • camel-jbang-plugin-route-parser
  • camel-jbang-plugin-tui
  • camel-jbang-plugin-validate
  • camel-jpa
  • camel-launcher-container
  • camel-yaml-dsl-validator
  • camel-yaml-dsl-validator-maven-plugin
Modules with tests skipped (29)
  • apache-camel
  • camel-allcomponents
  • camel-catalog
  • camel-catalog-console
  • camel-catalog-lucene
  • camel-catalog-maven
  • camel-catalog-suggest
  • camel-componentdsl
  • camel-csimple-maven-plugin
  • camel-endpointdsl
  • camel-endpointdsl-support
  • camel-itest
  • camel-jbang-core
  • camel-jbang-it
  • camel-jbang-main
  • camel-jbang-plugin-edit
  • camel-jbang-plugin-generate
  • camel-jbang-plugin-kubernetes
  • camel-jbang-plugin-test
  • camel-kamelet-main
  • camel-launcher
  • camel-report-maven-plugin
  • camel-route-parser
  • camel-yaml-dsl
  • camel-yaml-dsl-deserializers
  • camel-yaml-dsl-maven-plugin
  • coverage
  • docs
  • dummy-component

ℹ️ Shadow mode — Scalpel observes but does not affect test execution. Learn more

All tested modules (38 modules)
  • Camel :: All Components Sync point
  • Camel :: Assembly
  • Camel :: Catalog :: CSimple Maven Plugin (deprecated)
  • Camel :: Catalog :: Camel Catalog
  • Camel :: Catalog :: Camel Report Maven Plugin
  • Camel :: Catalog :: Camel Route Parser
  • Camel :: Catalog :: Console
  • Camel :: Catalog :: Dummy Component
  • Camel :: Catalog :: Lucene (deprecated)
  • Camel :: Catalog :: Maven
  • Camel :: Catalog :: Suggest
  • Camel :: Component DSL
  • Camel :: Coverage
  • Camel :: Docs
  • Camel :: Endpoint DSL
  • Camel :: Endpoint DSL :: Support
  • Camel :: Integration Tests
  • Camel :: JBang :: Core
  • Camel :: JBang :: Integration tests
  • Camel :: JBang :: MCP
  • Camel :: JBang :: Main
  • Camel :: JBang :: Plugin :: Edit
  • Camel :: JBang :: Plugin :: Generate
  • Camel :: JBang :: Plugin :: Kubernetes
  • Camel :: JBang :: Plugin :: MCP
  • Camel :: JBang :: Plugin :: Route Parser
  • Camel :: JBang :: Plugin :: TUI
  • Camel :: JBang :: Plugin :: Testing
  • Camel :: JBang :: Plugin :: Validate
  • Camel :: JPA
  • Camel :: Kamelet Main
  • Camel :: Launcher
  • Camel :: Launcher :: Container
  • Camel :: YAML DSL
  • Camel :: YAML DSL :: Deserializers
  • Camel :: YAML DSL :: Maven Plugins
  • Camel :: YAML DSL :: Validator
  • Camel :: YAML DSL :: Validator Maven Plugin

⚙️ View full build and test results

@davsclaus davsclaus added this to the 4.22.0 milestone Jul 16, 2026
@davsclaus davsclaus self-assigned this Jul 16, 2026
@davsclaus davsclaus added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 16, 2026
@davsclaus
davsclaus merged commit dd3a991 into main Jul 16, 2026
5 checks passed
@davsclaus
davsclaus deleted the fix/CAMEL-24130 branch July 16, 2026 13:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working components

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants