Skip to content

branch-4.1: [improvement](fe) Evaluate protobuf 4 with Arrow 19 (#61943)#63720

Open
CalvinKirs wants to merge 4 commits into
apache:branch-4.1from
CalvinKirs:4.1-61943
Open

branch-4.1: [improvement](fe) Evaluate protobuf 4 with Arrow 19 (#61943)#63720
CalvinKirs wants to merge 4 commits into
apache:branch-4.1from
CalvinKirs:4.1-61943

Conversation

@CalvinKirs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Issue Number: None

Related PR: None

Problem Summary: Align FE-side protobuf and Arrow Java dependencies for
the protobuf 4 / Arrow 19 evaluation, add the required Gson exclusion
for protobuf 4 builders, and cover the behavior with a focused FE unit
test.

None

(cherry picked from commit 94fd23d)
@CalvinKirs CalvinKirs requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner May 27, 2026 06:20
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@CalvinKirs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FE Regression Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 40.00% (2/5) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

@CalvinKirs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

run feut

@CalvinKirs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

run buildall

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants