[branch-4.0][test](auth) Move backup auth case to nonConcurrent#65293
Open
shuke987 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
[branch-4.0][test](auth) Move backup auth case to nonConcurrent#65293shuke987 wants to merge 1 commit into
shuke987 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
Collaborator
Author
|
run buildall |
Collaborator
Author
|
/review |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review complete. I did not find any issue that needs an inline comment.
Critical checkpoints:
- Changed-file scope: reviewed the only changed file,
regression-test/suites/auth_call/test_ddl_backup_auth.groovy. - Diff behavior: the PR only adds the
nonConcurrentsuite tag totest_ddl_backup_auth. - Regression framework:
nonConcurrentis parsed from comma-separated tags, maps the suite to SINGLE execution, and keeps it out of the normal parallel path. - CI selection: the nonConcurrent regression config selects
testGroups = "nonConcurrent"and has the S3 repository config defaults needed by this backup/auth case. - Backport consistency: #61384 made the same tag change on master for the same stabilization reason.
- Duplicate review context: no existing inline review threads or comments were present for this PR.
- User focus: no additional user-provided review focus was specified.
- Validation:
git diff --checkpassed. I did not run the regression case locally because it requires the Doris regression environment and S3 repository credentials/config.
Subagent conclusions:
optimizer-rewrite: no candidates; convergence round 1 returnedNO_NEW_VALUABLE_FINDINGS.tests-session-config: no candidates; convergence round 1 returnedNO_NEW_VALUABLE_FINDINGS.- No candidates were accepted, dismissed, or merged as duplicates, and the final proposed inline comment set is empty.
Note: I could not find a repository-local code-review SKILL.md in this checkout after searching before the review, so I followed the review prompt and shared-ledger workflow directly.
Collaborator
Author
|
run buildall |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Testing