Skip to content

FINERACT-1911: Alter datatable - column update, delete fix - #3385

Merged
adamsaghy merged 1 commit into
apache:developfrom
marta-jankovics:FINERACT-1911
Aug 25, 2023
Merged

FINERACT-1911: Alter datatable - column update, delete fix#3385
adamsaghy merged 1 commit into
apache:developfrom
marta-jankovics:FINERACT-1911

Conversation

@marta-jankovics

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Describe the changes made and why they were made.

Ignore if these details are present on the associated Apache Fineract JIRA ticket.

Checklist

Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!

  • Write the commit message as per https://github.com/apache/fineract/#pull-requests

  • Acknowledge that we will not review PRs that are not passing the build ("green") - it is your responsibility to get a proposed PR to pass the build, not primarily the project's maintainers.

  • Create/update unit or integration tests for verifying the changes made.

  • Follow coding conventions at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Coding+Conventions.

  • Add required Swagger annotation and update API documentation at fineract-provider/src/main/resources/static/legacy-docs/apiLive.htm with details of any API changes

  • Submission is not a "code dump". (Large changes can be made "in repository" via a branch. Ask on the developer mailing list for guidance, if required.)

FYI our guidelines for code reviews are at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Code+Review+Guide.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am adding a note on my PR because I would like this change to be approved.
This field was requested to be unique: true, indexed: true already on create. So sending an update request with the indexed flag to be true can not set the unique flag to false. I think this was a bug, but please confirm.

@adamsaghy adamsaghy Aug 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds like a bug...but i am assuming by not sending it is considered the default value then which is false... i am not recalling from the top of my head whether the unique field is mandatory ot not

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Exactly, that was the problem, not sending something on update means no change and not set to default value. If the field is mandatory, then it was already set on insert.

@adamsaghy adamsaghy left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@adamsaghy
adamsaghy merged commit ee31ff0 into apache:develop Aug 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants