Skip to content

[FLINK-20665][Connectors / FileSystem]FileNotFoundException when rest… - #14438

Merged
JingsongLi merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
zhuxiaoshang:FLINK-20665
Dec 21, 2020
Merged

[FLINK-20665][Connectors / FileSystem]FileNotFoundException when rest…#14438
JingsongLi merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
zhuxiaoshang:FLINK-20665

Conversation

@zhuxiaoshang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

…ore from latest Checkpoint

What is the purpose of the change

fix FileNotFoundException when compact big files in hdfs

Brief change log

(for example:)

  • fix FileNotFoundException when compact big files in hdfs

Verifying this change

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

  • testCompactOperator

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no) no
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (yes / no) no
  • The serializers: (yes / no / don't know) no
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / don't know) no
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know) no
  • The S3 file system connector: (yes / no / don't know) no

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no) no
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented) no

@flinkbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit 9e4dac0 (Sun Dec 20 16:02:53 UTC 2020)

Warnings:

  • No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!

Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.

Details
The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@flinkbot

flinkbot commented Dec 20, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run travis re-run the last Travis build
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

@JingsongLi JingsongLi left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@JingsongLi
JingsongLi merged commit 94e4d2a into apache:master Dec 21, 2020
JingsongLi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2020
… from latest Checkpoint in Sink Compaction

This closes #14438
meijies pushed a commit to meijies/flink that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2020
… from latest Checkpoint in Sink Compaction

This closes apache#14438
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants