Skip to content

Conversation

@baixitou28
Copy link

What is the purpose of the change

(For example: This pull request makes task deployment go through the blob server, rather than through RPC. That way we avoid re-transferring them on each deployment (during recovery).)

Brief change log

(for example:)

  • The TaskInfo is stored in the blob store on job creation time as a persistent artifact
  • Deployments RPC transmits only the blob storage reference
  • TaskManagers retrieve the TaskInfo from the blob cache

Verifying this change

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (100MB)
  • Extended integration test for recovery after master (JobManager) failure
  • Added test that validates that TaskInfo is transferred only once across recoveries
  • Manually verified the change by running a 4 node cluser with 2 JobManagers and 4 TaskManagers, a stateful streaming program, and killing one JobManager and two TaskManagers during the execution, verifying that recovery happens correctly.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (yes / no)
  • The serializers: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / don't know)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The S3 file system connector: (yes / no / don't know)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

Aitozi and others added 30 commits October 1, 2021 09:53
…tionDriver and ZooKeeperLeaderRetrievalDriver

add tests

This closes apache#17150.
The added loader constructs the classloader based on the target/classes directory of flink-rpc-akka, after downloading required dependencies via maven.
State that only the MemoryStateBackend does not support local recovery.
…inWithEquiTimeAttrs until FLINK-24443 is fixed
Signed-off-by: slinkydeveloper <francescoguard@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: slinkydeveloper <francescoguard@gmail.com>
…s when accessing row data type instances

Signed-off-by: slinkydeveloper <francescoguard@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: slinkydeveloper <francescoguard@gmail.com>
…e() methods and add new ResolvedSchema#getPrimaryKeyIndexes

Signed-off-by: slinkydeveloper <francescoguard@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: slinkydeveloper <francescoguard@gmail.com>
…Information(LogicalType) and DynamicTableSink.Context#createTypeInformation(LogicalType)

Signed-off-by: slinkydeveloper <francescoguard@gmail.com>
…yKeyIndexes and DynamicTableFactory.Context#getPhysicalRowDataType

Signed-off-by: slinkydeveloper <francescoguard@gmail.com>

This closes apache#17381.
Add factory methods for production code paths (where parameters must be resolved from the maps that Netty provides) and test code paths (where parameters are already resolved).
zhuzhurk and others added 27 commits November 4, 2021 19:30
…uration

The CheckpointCoordinatorConfiguration was unnecessarily stored in the CheckpointStatsTracker. We can store it directly in the ExecutionGraph instead.
Signed-off-by: slinkydeveloper <francescoguard@gmail.com>

This closes apache#17642.
…s monotonicity on the sort key field of UpdatableTopNFunction

This closes apache#17605
The error is not currently used anywhere and makes it harder to add more uses of the interface.
We wait either way for the process to complete (be it for the submission when detached, or the job completion when attached to parse the JobID), so we can just run the submission process in a blocking fashion
Required for adding a user-provided Scala library to lib.
…rovide the projected data type

Signed-off-by: slinkydeveloper <francescoguard@gmail.com>

This closes apache#17662.
…friction when using Stream of fields

Signed-off-by: slinkydeveloper <francescoguard@gmail.com>

This closes apache#17688.
@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Nov 7, 2021

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Nov 7, 2021

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit b3b5055 (Sun Nov 07 12:32:32 UTC 2021)

Warnings:

  • 200 pom.xml files were touched: Check for build and licensing issues.
  • Invalid pull request title: No valid Jira ID provided

Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.

Details
The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@zentol zentol closed this Nov 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.