Skip to content

Conversation

@leesf
Copy link
Contributor

@leesf leesf commented Dec 25, 2018

What is the purpose of the change

Add back to button in Joining docs and place it to right place in Process Function docs.

Brief change log

  • Add back to button in Joining docs and place it to right place in Process Function docs.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (yes / no)
  • The serializers: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / don't know)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The S3 file system connector: (yes / no / don't know)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

…nd is not properly placed in the Process Function document
Copy link
Contributor

@yanghua yanghua left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@leesf Thanks for your contribution. Just a minor suggestion.

</div>
</div>


Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think a blank line is enough. What do you think?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yanghua Thanks for the review. Have updated the PR to address your comment, since a blank space is a more common practice.


<span class="label label-info">Note</span> Stopping a timer has no effect if no such timer with the given timestamp is registered.


Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto

…nd is not properly placed in the Process Function document
Copy link
Contributor

@yanghua yanghua left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now, LGTM

@leesf
Copy link
Contributor Author

leesf commented Dec 25, 2018

cc @tzulitai

@leesf leesf closed this Jan 2, 2019
@leesf leesf deleted the FLINK-11217 branch January 2, 2019 07:13
@leesf leesf restored the FLINK-11217 branch January 2, 2019 07:13
@leesf leesf reopened this Jan 2, 2019
@leesf leesf closed this Jan 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants