-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.9k
[FLINK-11217] Back to top button is missing in the Joining document a… #7360
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…nd is not properly placed in the Process Function document
yanghua
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@leesf Thanks for your contribution. Just a minor suggestion.
docs/dev/stream/operators/joining.md
Outdated
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think a blank line is enough. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yanghua Thanks for the review. Have updated the PR to address your comment, since a blank space is a more common practice.
|
|
||
| <span class="label label-info">Note</span> Stopping a timer has no effect if no such timer with the given timestamp is registered. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ditto
…nd is not properly placed in the Process Function document
yanghua
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now, LGTM
|
cc @tzulitai |
What is the purpose of the change
Add back to button in Joining docs and place it to right place in Process Function docs.
Brief change log
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
@Public(Evolving): (yes / no)Documentation